<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 BCS Championship Game Betting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.betfirms.com/2009-bcs-championship-game-betting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.betfirms.com/2009-bcs-championship-game-betting/</link>
	<description>Handicapping tips from the experts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:49:27 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://www.betfirms.com/2009-bcs-championship-game-betting/comment-page-1/#comment-582</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betfirms.com/?p=4382#comment-582</guid>
		<description>PLEASE! If it&#039;s all about money than why would they put Oklahoma in it? Yea, like Oklahoma is the booming mecca of the US and has such a huge consumer base. If it was about money don&#039;t you think it would be USC? Little more population to draw from there. Money is a factor always but quit crying. As long as the SEC is as stacked as it is they will always be in the BCS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PLEASE! If it&#8217;s all about money than why would they put Oklahoma in it? Yea, like Oklahoma is the booming mecca of the US and has such a huge consumer base. If it was about money don&#8217;t you think it would be USC? Little more population to draw from there. Money is a factor always but quit crying. As long as the SEC is as stacked as it is they will always be in the BCS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://www.betfirms.com/2009-bcs-championship-game-betting/comment-page-1/#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betfirms.com/?p=4382#comment-581</guid>
		<description>A national vote would just rank all of the teams in the most populated areas highest, I don&#039;t think that&#039;s a very valid way to pick a National Champion.  How do you define &quot;most&quot; deserving?  You can make a strong case for Utah now that they beat Alabama, but before that win, nobody really knew how good that team was.  It&#039;s simply a limitation that they have for playing in a crappy conference.  USC is a good team, but they have one loss just like Florida and Oklahoma.  The Trojans aren&#039;t any more deserving than those two teams.  I can buy the argument for money with Utah because they are in such a small market, but why would the BCS purposely keep USC out?  They are in one of the biggest markets in the US!  There&#039;s no conspiracy here.  An arbitrary math model spit two teams out as the &quot;best&quot; this year.  Both teams are deserving enough, so what&#039;s the problem?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A national vote would just rank all of the teams in the most populated areas highest, I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s a very valid way to pick a National Champion.  How do you define &#8220;most&#8221; deserving?  You can make a strong case for Utah now that they beat Alabama, but before that win, nobody really knew how good that team was.  It&#8217;s simply a limitation that they have for playing in a crappy conference.  USC is a good team, but they have one loss just like Florida and Oklahoma.  The Trojans aren&#8217;t any more deserving than those two teams.  I can buy the argument for money with Utah because they are in such a small market, but why would the BCS purposely keep USC out?  They are in one of the biggest markets in the US!  There&#8217;s no conspiracy here.  An arbitrary math model spit two teams out as the &#8220;best&#8221; this year.  Both teams are deserving enough, so what&#8217;s the problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.betfirms.com/2009-bcs-championship-game-betting/comment-page-1/#comment-580</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betfirms.com/?p=4382#comment-580</guid>
		<description>Same old tired answer. It&#039;s really all about money and contracts. The &quot;most&quot; deserving teams is the real question. How about a national vote after the bowl games are over? The arguments are much stronger for USC or Utah than any other teams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same old tired answer. It&#8217;s really all about money and contracts. The &#8220;most&#8221; deserving teams is the real question. How about a national vote after the bowl games are over? The arguments are much stronger for USC or Utah than any other teams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://www.betfirms.com/2009-bcs-championship-game-betting/comment-page-1/#comment-579</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betfirms.com/?p=4382#comment-579</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m actually pretty tired of hearing this argument.  How can you say that Florida and Oklahoma aren&#039;t deserving to play for the National Championship?  Are there other teams that are deserving as well?  A few are close.  But to say that Utah and USC are MORE deserving that these two teams just isn&#039;t right.  If it were a Utah/USC BCS game there would still be people complaining about Florida and Oklahoma not getting in.  Even if they switched to some kind of playoff there would be a team like TCU or even Utah that might get left out of the bracket.  Then what?  You&#039;re right back to where you are now, complaining that the system is flawed.  Guess what?  There is no such thing as a perfect system.  Welcome to the world! =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually pretty tired of hearing this argument.  How can you say that Florida and Oklahoma aren&#8217;t deserving to play for the National Championship?  Are there other teams that are deserving as well?  A few are close.  But to say that Utah and USC are MORE deserving that these two teams just isn&#8217;t right.  If it were a Utah/USC BCS game there would still be people complaining about Florida and Oklahoma not getting in.  Even if they switched to some kind of playoff there would be a team like TCU or even Utah that might get left out of the bracket.  Then what?  You&#8217;re right back to where you are now, complaining that the system is flawed.  Guess what?  There is no such thing as a perfect system.  Welcome to the world! =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.betfirms.com/2009-bcs-championship-game-betting/comment-page-1/#comment-578</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betfirms.com/?p=4382#comment-578</guid>
		<description>The BCS should be renamed the BS Championship. What a joke! Neither of the two best teams are in the title game. I&#039;ll put up $40,000,000 to have Utah play USC for the real national championship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The BCS should be renamed the BS Championship. What a joke! Neither of the two best teams are in the title game. I&#8217;ll put up $40,000,000 to have Utah play USC for the real national championship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
