Deposit Instantly Using Your Credit Card at Sportsbook.com!
Simple Jacks or Better Strategy
Written July 21, 2008 by Jack Jones
The following strategy is my “simple strategy” for jacks or better video poker. Using the strategy on a full pay machine will result in an expected return of 99.46%. Compared to the optimal strategy return of 99.54%, mistakes in the simple strategy will cost 0.08%, or one total bet every 1178 hands.To use the strategy look up all viable ways to play an initial hand on the following list and elect that which is highest on the list. A “high card” means a jack or higher.
- Full house or better
- 4 to a royal flush
- Straight, three of a kind, or flush
- 4 to a straight flush
- Two pair
- High pair
- 3 to a royal flush
- 4 to a flush
- Low pair
- 4 to an outside straight
- 2 suited high cards
- 3 to a straight flush
- 2 unsuited high cards (if more than 2 pick then pick lowest 2)
- Suited 10/J, 10/Q, or 10/K
- One high card
- Discard everything
Terms:
High card: A jack, queen, king, or ace. These cards are retained more often because if paired up they return the original bet.
Outside straight: An open ended straight that can be completed at either end, such as the cards 7,8,9,10.
Inside straight: A straight with a missing inside card, such as the cards 6,7,9,10. In addition A,2,3,4 and J,Q,K,A also count as inside straights because they are at an extreme end.
Example: Suppose you have the following hand.





The top three plays are (1) keep the low pair, (2) keep the 4 to a flush, and (3) keep the 2 suited high cards. The 4 to a flush is listed highest and is thus the best play, so discard the 3 of hearts.
Comparison to Optimal Strategy
The following table compares the probability and return of each hand under both the simple strategy and the optimal strategy.
| Simple Strategy to Optimal Strategy Comparison
|
|||||
| Hand | Pays | Probability | Return | ||
| Simple | Optimal | Simple | Optimal | ||
| Royal flush | 800 | 0.000025 | 0.000025 | 0.020076 | 0.019807 |
| Straight flush | 50 | 0.000111 | 0.000109 | 0.005552 | 0.005465 |
| Four of a kind | 25 | 0.002363 | 0.002363 | 0.059067 | 0.059064 |
| Full house | 9 | 0.011517 | 0.011512 | 0.103657 | 0.10361 |
| Flush | 6 | 0.011087 | 0.011015 | 0.066521 | 0.066087 |
| Straight | 4 | 0.010637 | 0.011229 | 0.042547 | 0.044917 |
| Three of a kind | 3 | 0.074543 | 0.074449 | 0.223629 | 0.223346 |
| Two pair | 2 | 0.129552 | 0.129279 | 0.259104 | 0.258558 |
| Pair | 1 | 0.214437 | 0.214585 | 0.214437 | 0.214585 |
| Nothing | 0 | 0.545729 | 0.545435 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 1 | 1 | 0.99459 | 0.995439 | |
The next table is a frequency distribution of the error, or difference in expected return, between the simple strategy and the optimal strategy.
| Error Frequency
|
||
| Error | Number | Probability |
| 0 | 2540016 | 97.732016% |
| .01% to .99% | 5808 | 0.223474% |
| 1% to 1.99% | 12084 | 0.464955% |
| 2% to 2.99% | 6336 | 0.24379% |
| 3% to 3.99% | 7320 | 0.281651% |
| 4% to 4.99% | 11976 | 0.4608% |
| 5% to 5.99% | 11868 | 0.456644% |
| 6% to 6.99% | 1260 | 0.048481% |
| 7% to 7.99% | 216 | 0.008311% |
| 8% to 8.99% | 0 | 0% |
| 9% to 9.99% | 0 | 0% |
| 10% to 10.99% | 0 | 0% |
| 11% to 11.99% | 768 | 0.02955% |
| 12% to 12.99% | 36 | 0.001385% |
| 13% to 13.99% | 216 | 0.008311% |
| 14% to 14.99% | 840 | 0.032321% |
| 15% to 15.99% | 216 | 0.008311% |
| Total | 2598960 | 100% |
HTML clipboardBetter known as “The Wizard of Odds”, Michael Shackleford uses math and computer analysis to determine optimal playing strategy for all casino games. His work can be found on his website, WizardofOdds.com with player strategies and probabilities on most of the casino games. Michael lives in Las Vegas and in his spare time likes to college license plates and gamble.
You can read more about Michael’s work at his website, WizardofOdds.com
If you liked this article, you may also be interested in:
- Jacks or Better Intermediate Strategy
- Dueces Wild Simple Strategy
- Jacks or Better Strategy
- Dueces Wild Optimal Play
- Video Poker Strategy
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Got something to say?







No comments yet, but your thoughts are welcome!